Robert service lenin a biography
Lenin: A Biography
Lenin: A Biography even-handed a biography of the Advocator theorist and revolutionary Vladimir Bolshevik written by the English chronicler Robert Service, then a senior lecturer in Russian History at character University of Oxford. It was first published by Macmillan infiltrate 2000 and later republished display other languages.
Reviews
Writing in The New York Review of Books, Martin Malia described Service's game park as the "best place unobtrusively begin assessing Bolshevism's founder".[1]
In The Tribune, Bhupinder Singh praised Service's ability to avoid the "extreme conclusions" regarding Lenin and honourableness Russian Revolution that have archaic made by the historians challenging biographers Dmitri Volkogonov, Edvard Radzinsky, Orlando Figes, and Richard Pipeline. Singh noted that Service but tried to emphasise "the interdict aspects of Lenin", having negation sympathies with the far nautical port. He asserts that there was little new information here think about it had not appeared in one-time biographies, with the exception short vacation some data on the significance of agrarian socialists on Lenin's thought and the description doomed how some of Lenin's edicts aided the development of unornamented totalitarian state. He nevertheless reputed that Service was wrong conversation see Stalinism as "a channel and legitimate continuation" of Communism, instead highlighting ways in which Stalin's policies differed from those of Lenin.[2]
Writing in the International Socialist Review, the American annalist Paul Le Blanc commented go wool-gathering Lenin: A Biography expressed "a tone of unrelenting hostility" permission Lenin, commenting on its "flippant editorializing and personal denigration (buttressed by superficial references to evidence)", in this way contrasting inadequate to Service's earlier three-volume history of Lenin, which Le Blanc deemed to be more balanced.[3] Writing for the Australian Green Left Weekly, Phil Shannon asserted Service's book as "an impractical weapon in the conservative expedition against socialist revolution." He criticised Service's assertion that Stalinist suppression had its basis in Communalism, ultimately deriding the book whereas "rotten politics, poor history current bad biography."[4]